Go to the U of M home page

Pages

Thursday, November 17, 2016

New Exhibit: "Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective"

A new exhibit, "Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective," is open at the Riesenfeld Center.

Title page of A True Copy of the Journal of The High Court of Justice for the Tryal of K. Charles I., London 1683.
Trial of Charles I of England,
tried and executed for treason 
in 1649.
War and conflict are often witness to deep violations of law and justice. When armed conflict subsides, and after the fall of oppressive regimes, important questions arise as to which punitive measures and reparations can bring guilty parties to justice, and rehabilitate those subject to crime and loss. Transitional justice seeks to address these issues, and to understand how to achieve a just and stable society in the wake of conflict.

By what means, how far, and through whose agency, deep violations of law and justice are to be redressed in the wake of conflict, are not only contemporary questions but are as old as conflict itself. Historical governments at various moments have relied on markedly procedural measures against defeated political and military leaders, focusing on the punishment of offenders, the restitution of property and other rights, and the re-establishment of civil society.


Cover of Military Government Germany Technical Manual.
St. Paul attorney and Dachau war crimes
prosecutor Horace Hansen's copy of
administrative manual for post-Nazi
Germany
"Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective," in the Library's Riesenfeld Rare Books Center, highlights volumes that touch on theories and moments of transitional justice and post-conflict reconciliation, from high medieval Europe through the war crimes trials following WWII. From the first academic commentary on a peace treaty, to the trial of Charles I, to the notebook of a Dachau war crimes prosecutor, the exhibit invites visitors to consider transitional justice from its foundations in history and comparative practice.

"Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective" was created as part of the Law School Human Rights Center's Transitional Justice Week and is open through the spring.

For more information or directions, please contact Ryan Greenwood, Curator of Rare Books and Special Collections (612-625-7323; rgreenwo@umn.edu).




Monday, October 31, 2016

Wednesday, November 2: Rare Books Group Open House

Come out this Wednesday to our November open house for the rare books group! Due to October success, we will have open houses on the first Wednesdays of the month. 

It is a great way to see (more) treasures from the Library's rare books collection, and of course enjoy free snacks and drinks!

Rare Books Group Open House
When: Wednesday, November 2, 1 p.m - 3 p.m.
Where: Riesenfeld Rare Books Center (N30 - on the sub-plaza past Sullivan Cafe)
What: See treasures from the rare books collection, and enjoy snacks and drinks!

Four volumes of Blackstone's Commentaries.

Friday, October 28, 2016

Our Year Books, and the Case of Thorns (1466)

Page titled De Termino Michaelis, Anno VI, Edwardi Quarti.  The text is written in Law French and arranged in a block format with an embellished decorative initial letter "V" signaling the beginning of the section.
Year Book, Michaelmas term, 6 Edward 4 (London, Tottle: 1557)
The English Year Books, the earliest English law reports, are a rich repository of English decisions dating back to the reigns of medieval kings.  The practice of reporting itself seems to have originated informally among students of the law; the early reporters are unknown and their reports circulated in manuscript before the advent of printing.  The Year Books stretch back to the 13th century and extend to 1535, and were printed and reprinted often in the 16th century.  The earliest title in our rare books collection is in fact an abridgement of case reports known as Statham's Abridgement (1490), and our collection of Year Books is one of the strongest outside of England.

In September, I showed several copies of our Year Books featuring the Case of Thorns (1466) in Professor David Weissbrodt's Torts class.  The class begins with an analysis of this English classic, with its early theory of civil liability.  In the case, a man who cuts branches from a bush on his own property and goes to retrieve the waste from his neighbor's property (where it had fallen), is found liable for trespass.

Our rare books collection includes three printings of the Case of Thorns from before 1600.  The first two are Year Books from Richard Tottell's press, dating to 1557; the third, also by Tottell, from 1572.  Tottell was the most prolific printer of law books in 16th-century England, and a founding member of the Stationer's Company, who held a royal patent to publish law books from 1553 until his death in 1593.

Our first two copies of the Case of Thorns contain an interesting misprint of a key part of the case.  Instead of text that should read "ipso invito" (the thing [done] against his will), our 1557 editions have "ipso muto" (the thing having been changed).  The case depends on the fact that the thorns fell on the plaintiff's property "against or without [the defendant's] will."  In one of our editions an early student or lawyer even crossed out "ipso muto" and wrote in "ipso invito" (pictured below).  By 1572, Tottell and his workshop had corrected the error.  It may have annoyed practitioners, but was a good test for law students.    

Reading the text even in the early modern period took training - the Year Books were written in Latin or Law French and were highly abbreviated.  The dense Gothic script in which they were printed did not help matters much.  Below is the beginning of the Case of Thorns, with an approximation of the marks used to abbreviate the (already difficult) Law French.  It is a good thing that students who still wrestle with the Case of Thorns today do so in more readable form.           

Un home port br̃ de tñs quar̃ vi et armis clam̃ fr̃ et c. Et herbam suam pedibus conculcando consumpsit supp̃ le tñs en v. ac̃r et le def, dit quaunte a veñ et c.: et le trñs en les v. ac̃r de rien coup̃ et quant a le tñs en le v. ac̃r ac̃c̃ ne doit le pÌ aver̃ q̃r il dit q̃ il m̃ ad un ac̃r de terre sur quell un hay de thornes est…

Close-up of one paragraph from the Case of Thorns.
First page of the Case of Thorns, with "ipso muto" struck out and "ipso invito" written above

   - Ryan Greenwood, Curator of Rare Books and Special Collections

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Wednesday, October 5: Rare Books Group Open House

Come out tomorrow to an open house for the rare books group! It is a great way to see treasures from the Library's rare books collection, and of course enjoy free snacks and drinks!

Rare Books Group Open House
When: Wednesday, October 5, 1 p.m - 3 p.m.
Where: Riesenfeld Rare Books Center (N30 - on the sub-plaza past Sullivan Cafe)
What: See treasures from the rare books collection, and enjoy snacks and drinks! 

Antique leather-bound book with decorative embossed leather cover.








Bobbleheads Open House - Winners!

Bobblehead Justice David Brewer.
Congratulations to the winners of the prize drawings from the bobbleheads exhibit open house! The main drawing, for a bobblehead of Supreme Court justice David Brewer (1837-1910), was won by Franklin Rosenberg. Among other case references, the Brewer figure stands at a washtub, representing his opinion in Muller v. Oregon (1908) that limited the hours women could work.  Great thanks to The Green Bag and its editor, Professor Ross Davies, for the Brewer bobblehead.

Equal congratulations to Alex Galle-From and Nick Muellerleile, the winners of the Roberts Challenge. The Challenge asked participants to correctly identify case references on the newest Supreme Court bobblehead, that of Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. The identifications were: a) the broccoli held in Roberts's left hand; b) the crab near his left foot; and c) the reference to "oysters and raisins" on the base of the bobblehead. Mr. Galle-From and Mr. Muellerleile's correct entries were selected from a drawing.

Bobblehead Justice John G Roberts, Jr.
The answers to the puzzle are as follows: a) National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius. In the Chief Justice's majority opinion, broccoli is referenced 12 times, most memorably as "the broccoli horrible," the hypothetical specter of a mandate to purchase the green vegetable. The crab refers to: b) FCC v. AT&T, a case in which Roberts noted that adjectival meanings of words, like "crabbed," may differ from their noun roots (i.e., crab). Finally, and interestingly for us, is c) Horne v. Department of Agriculture, a case that centered on the Takings Clause. In his opinion, Roberts distinguished "oysters" from "raisins" by observing that raisins were the fruits of Horne's labor, whereas oysters were "ferae naturae," or of a wild nature, belonging to the state. The government ultimately had to compensate Horne for a taking (by remitting a large fine).  

The principle that some animals are "of a wild nature" and owned by the state is reflected in an early English case that we have in our rare books collection. In The Case of Swans (1592), the royal court found the swans at issue were "ferae naturae," and thus could not be acquired by transfer or prescription. They were also "Royal fowl," owned by the Queen.     

   - Ryan Greenwood, Curator of Rare Books and Special Collections     

     

Friday, September 16, 2016

Wednesday, September 21: Bobbleheads Fall Open House!

Bobblehead Justice Harry A Blackmun.
(Justice Blackmun, however, is not
the prize!) 
This fall, the bobbleheads are back by popular demand. All are invited next Wednesday, September 21, to an open house for the bobbleheads exhibit in the Riesenfeld Center:
"Equal Caricature Under Law: Supreme Court Bobbleheads by The Green Bag"

When: Wednesday, September 21, 12 noon - 4:00 p.m
Where: Riesenfeld Center, room N30 on the sub plaza level

Enter a drawing to win a Supreme Court bobblehead!  Enjoy free food and refreshments throughout the day.

Artful and highly collectible, the Supreme Court bobbleheads depict historical and current justices with witty references to the justices' notable cases.  The bobbleheads are produced in limited runs, and are typically obtained only by receiving and redeeming a sought-after certificate.  The Law Library is proud to hold the only complete institutional collection of the figurines, apart from a similar collection at the Yale Law Library.  

The exhibit includes over 30 historical volumes drawn from the Riesenfeld Center's Arthur C. Pulling Rare Books Collection.  From the Federalist Papers to Brandeis's famous dissent in Olmstead v. United States, these volumes, and accompanying biographical information, highlight the featured justices' careers and their significant work.

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Welcome New and Returning Students!

Bobblehead Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

As the semester begins, the Law Library's Supreme Court bobbleheads exhibit is back, by popular demand, and on display in the Riesenfeld Rare Books Center through December (N30, Sub-plaza). Come by to our bobbleheads open house later in September and several of our related events:

Welcome Back Cookies
When: Thursday, September 8, starting at 10 a.m.
Where: Library Lobby
What: Cookies!

Constitution Day Celebration
When: Wednesday, September 14, 11 a.m. - 1 p.m.
Where: Library Lobby
What: Donuts and drinks (and a Constitution crossword puzzle for prizes).

Bobbleheads Open House
When: Wednesday, September 21, 12 p.m - 4 p.m.
Where: Riesenfeld Rare Books Center
What: Snacks and drinks, and a drawing to win a Supreme Court bobblehead! 

Good luck and best wishes this semester from the Law Library and Riesenfeld Center!


Supreme court bobbleheads of Justices Ginsberg, Breyer, Thomas, and Scalia.